Thursday, March 12, 2009

New York to 190K?

We are pleased to confirm reports that several New York law firms will be raising first year salaries to $190,000 per year. A spokesperson for one of the firms reports “the move is necessary to draw top law students to this expensive city.” We expect, however, that this change in salary will eventually permeate all major legal markets. It’s time for law students nationwide to rejoice. Take out a few more grand in student loans. Buy yourself some expensive clothes. Book an exotic vacation. Times are good!

Unless you’re drinking the (spiked) kool-aid, you know the preceding paragraph was entirely facetious; I apologize for toying with your emotions. The bottom line is this wouldn’t have seemed so far fetched a year or two ago. In fact, such news was even expected within our legal bubble. Try telling a first year today that firms are raising salaries and they’ll have you committed to a mental asylum faster than the next batch of associates are laid off.

Sure enough, while cleaning out my e-mail’s in-box, I came across a message that a friend and fellow law student sent me during my first semester of law school. He wrote, “Just so you know, we’re not doing this for naught,” and then linked to an article. Ah, to be a 1L feels like a lifetime ago. I mean, I really had no recollection of this e-mail at all. And then I clicked the link: surprise, surprise! Optimism abounds! The article matter-of-factly asserts that “the question isn’t so much whether some New York City firms will up the ante again, but when” and explains that “[a]nother round of raises is inevitable.” Perhaps first semester of law school was another lifetime, metaphorically speaking, anyway.

I find it rather humorous (and a bit embarrassing) that the legal community legitimately believed that BigLaw salaries were going to rise to $190,000; that it was, in essence, a fait accompli. The economic recession that our nation is currently steeped in didn’t come out of nowhere. Granted, it wasn’t reasonable to expect a financial collapse of such epic proportions, but the market wasn’t exactly stable either.

What triggered this unrealistic assumption that salaries would rise (and rise, and rise, and rise….)? Perhaps the belief that salaries would increase stems from a sense of entitlement. Maybe the belief was caused by the insurmountable debt of law students. I can’t say for sure one way or another, but I have a hunch. In the sage words of Billy Joel, I—like everyone else in the legal world—“go to extremes.” Maybe it’s part of the law school mentality.

When times are good, the legal community basks in its greatness and expects there to be a never ending pool of wealth. Our unwarranted optimism is surpassed by only Wall Street. But, when things take a turn for the worst, the legal community is also only surpassed by Wall Street with the pessimism and panic that ensues. There just “ain’t no in between.”

So what can we learn from this? I think that, just as the contention that firms would raise salaries to 190K was unnecessarily optimistic, the word on the street that BigLaw is dying is unnecessarily pessimistic. Let’s face it: the legal community doesn’t handle highs and lows very well. Make sure to remember this before making any drastic decisions about your future in the profession.


  1. I wish what you said in the beginning was true. Goodd points..things could be worse.

  2. I read your first paragraph, but then my computer died. I went out and bought 1,000,000 shares of stocks. It looks like the market rose. Should I sell them now that I know it wasn't true?

  3. Hahahaha. Don't sell 4.27!!!!!

  4. Josh,

    I think you raise some excellent points, and hope the message resonates. In my view, you're undoubtedly correct on a macro-scale: law-people (students, practitioners, etc.) tend to be risk-averse, and thus view the world as one giant dichotomy.

    Not all of us are like this, though. I am--I'll grant that at the outset. But I know I'm somewhat unique in this respect. What I wonder is how you think our general norms affect those who would have more grounded (rational) outlooks.

    Do you think the panic or gloat mentality is a product of attending law school, or does law school simply tend to attract people who--like me--were predisposed to it?

  5. Thank you for being so informative, keep up the good work

  6. Craig,

    I don't think the "panic or gloat mentality" is a product of attending law school. I believe that the majority of law students chose to attend law school BECAUSE of this mentality. They/we believed getting into any law school, and especially a top law school, as being a golden ticket to success. It was immediately a reason to "gloat." Whenever this notion that our JD is a "golden ticket" is threatened, they/we panic.

    8:50 & 10:47;

    I'm glad you enjoyed the post. I hope that you'll return and continue commenting in the future.

  7. cheap goose jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    goose trillium parka jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada goose freestyle vest online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Chilliwack Bomber sale online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Mens Citadel jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    cheap Goose Expedition Parka coats online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    canada goose snow mantra parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Yorkville Parka Jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Chilliwack Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Expedition Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Kensington Parka Jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Montebello Parka jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Womens Solaris Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.